Learn why ubiquity kills brand cool factor. Discover how Apple, Harley-Davidson, and Figma maintain relevance as they grow. Expert insights on brand strategy.
Ubiquity Is the Opposite of Cool: How Brands Stay Relevant While Growing
Key Takeaways
- Ubiquity paradox: When brands become too mainstream and available everywhere, they lose their "cool factor" and cultural cachet
- The Gap lesson: Gap's presence on every street corner in the '90s transformed it from aspirational to ordinary, illustrating how over-expansion erodes brand appeal
- Challenger advantage: Consumers are drawn to underdog brands that challenge the status quo and represent independence and rebellion against mainstream norms
- Core audience alignment: Successful brands like Apple and Harley-Davidson maintain relevance by clearly defining and deeply connecting with their core audience values
- Design as differentiation: Companies can stay relevant during growth by committing to core principles—like Figma's unwavering focus on design thinking and methodology
Understanding the Ubiquity Paradox
The concept that "ubiquity is the opposite of cool" comes from insights shared by Sheila Joglekar Vashee, CMO of Figma, who frequently references the Urban Outfitters CEO's perspective on brand relevance. This paradox represents one of the most challenging contradictions in modern business: the more successful a company becomes and the wider its reach extends, the greater the risk it loses the very qualities that made it appealing in the first place.
The classic example that perfectly illustrates this principle is Gap's trajectory in the 1990s. During its peak, Gap was everywhere—on virtually every street corner in major shopping districts across America. The brand had achieved ubiquity. However, this omnipresence came with a critical cost. Gap transformed from being a coveted, aspirational brand that people actively sought out into something mundane and ordinary. When a product or brand becomes available everywhere and accessible to everyone, it stops being special. The exclusivity disappears, and with it, the cool factor that originally attracted customers. This wasn't a failure of product quality; it was a failure of brand positioning resulting from over-expansion and loss of distinctiveness.
Understanding this paradox is crucial for any growing company. The challenge isn't simply achieving market penetration or hitting growth targets—it's achieving those metrics while maintaining the brand qualities that made growth possible in the first place. Many companies discover too late that rapid expansion and widespread availability can actually diminish rather than enhance brand value.
The Challenger Advantage and Consumer Psychology
One of the most powerful psychological forces in consumer behavior is the human attraction to underdogs and challengers. People inherently want to align themselves with brands and movements that challenge the status quo, that represent something different from the mainstream, and that embody a spirit of independence and rebellion. This isn't a superficial preference; it's rooted in how humans construct identity and signal their values to others.
When a brand occupies the position of challenger or underdog, it offers consumers something beyond the product itself—it offers a narrative of disruption and authenticity. Being associated with such a brand allows consumers to see themselves as part of something larger than themselves, as participants in a movement that challenges conventional thinking. This emotional connection and sense of belonging is extraordinarily powerful in driving loyalty and word-of-mouth advocacy.
The challenger position is inherently cool because it represents differentiation. It says, "We're not like everyone else. We think differently. We're willing to take risks that larger, more established competitors won't take." This positioning resonates strongly with early adopters, innovators, and influential trendsetters who have disproportionate power in shaping broader consumer perception and adoption patterns.
However, here lies the central tension: the very success that takes a challenger from underdog to market leader often strips away the qualities that defined its challenger status. As companies grow their market share and customer base, they necessarily become more mainstream. They can't remain perpetual underdogs if they're winning. The question then becomes whether a company can find a way to maintain its core brand identity and values—the things that gave it challenger status—even as it achieves mainstream success.
How Legendary Brands Maintain Relevance Through Growth
Several brands have successfully navigated this treacherous terrain and managed to remain culturally relevant and cool even as they've achieved massive scale and ubiquity. Understanding their strategies provides valuable lessons for any company facing the growth-versus-relevance challenge.
Harley-Davidson presents one of the most instructive case studies. Despite becoming one of the world's largest motorcycle manufacturers and achieving extraordinary market penetration, Harley-Davidson has maintained an aura of independence, rebellion, and renegade spirit. The company didn't do this by accident or through clever marketing alone. Instead, Harley-Davidson made a deliberate strategic choice to celebrate and align with the renegade spirit and the independent, rebellious identity of its core customer base. The brand doesn't position itself as a mass-market product; it positions itself as a symbol of freedom and independence.
Harley-Davidson's approach involved several key elements: it deeply understood its core audience and their values, it consistently celebrated and reinforced those values in its brand narrative, and it maintained cultural authenticity by remaining true to the motorcycle lifestyle rather than attempting to broaden its appeal beyond its core market. Even though Harley motorcycles are available in dealerships worldwide, the brand has managed to preserve its association with independence and rebellion because it never abandoned its core positioning and audience focus.
Apple provides another compelling example, though it's worth noting that Apple's approach differs somewhat from Harley's. In Apple's early days, when the company was genuinely small and struggling against the IBM-dominated computing industry, Apple made a brilliant strategic decision: it clearly defined who it stood for and who it didn't. The famous "1984" advertisement and subsequent marketing campaigns explicitly positioned Apple as the choice for creative rebels fighting against conformity and corporate monotony. Apple clearly stated its values—creativity, individuality, challenging the status quo—and it attracted customers who identified with those values.
As Apple grew from struggling underdog to the world's most valuable company, it faced the same ubiquity challenge as Gap and others. However, Apple managed the transition more successfully by continuously reinventing how it expressed its core values rather than abandoning those values. When personal computers became ubiquitous, Apple moved to iPods, then iPhones, maintaining its positioning around design excellence, user experience, and the intersection of technology and humanity. The company stayed true to its core philosophy even as it expanded into new categories and reached broader audiences.
The critical difference between Apple and Gap's outcomes lay in how consistently they maintained commitment to their founding principles even during explosive growth. Apple never positioned itself as a mass-market commodity provider; it positioned itself as a provider of exceptionally designed technology for people who valued design and creativity. This positioning remains true whether Apple is selling to millions or billions of people.
Alignment With Core Audience as the Foundation
The common thread connecting successful brands like Harley-Davidson and Apple is their unwavering clarity about who their core audience is and what values matter most to that audience. This isn't vague, aspirational positioning; it's specific, actionable alignment that shows up in every major decision the company makes.
When a brand clearly articulates its core audience and aligns its entire organization around serving and resonating with that audience, something powerful happens: the brand becomes less vulnerable to the ubiquity trap. Why? Because the brand's relevance isn't measured primarily by how many people use it, but by how deeply and authentically it serves the values and aspirations of its chosen core audience.
This approach requires discipline and intentionality. It means saying no to market opportunities that don't align with core values. It means making decisions that might limit short-term growth but preserve long-term brand equity. It means understanding that not every customer is the right customer, and that serving everyone equally often means serving no one particularly well.
For companies experiencing growth, maintaining this core audience alignment becomes increasingly challenging. As organizations scale, they develop finance, operations, and business development teams that naturally push for expansion and broader market reach. There's financial pressure to maximize addressable market size. There's operational pressure to achieve efficiency through standardization and scale. These are rational business pressures, but they can gradually erode the specific, differentiated positioning that made the company appealing in the first place.
Successful brands manage this tension by making core audience alignment a non-negotiable strategic principle. They accept that by being exceptionally focused on serving their core audience exceptionally well, they will necessarily serve other audiences less well. They recognize that this focus, rather than limiting growth, actually enables sustainable growth because it preserves the brand equity that drives customer acquisition and retention.
Figma's Commitment to Design as Core Identity
The conversation around this concept of ubiquity versus cool arose from Sheila Joglekar Vashee's reflections on her experiences at Figma and previously at Dropbox. For Figma, the company has made a strategic commitment that extends far beyond product features: the company has committed itself to design as both a practice and a philosophy.
This commitment to design encompasses far more than visual aesthetics or user interface design. Rather, Figma understands design as a comprehensive way of thinking—a methodology for approaching problems, making decisions, and creating value. This philosophy extends into how the company thinks about its customers, its product development, its organizational culture, and its role in the broader design community.
By anchoring its identity so clearly to design thinking and practice, Figma creates a positioning that remains relevant even as the company grows and achieves widespread adoption. The question isn't "How many people are using Figma?" but rather "How deeply is Figma serving the design community and advancing the practice of design?" This framing allows Figma to maintain its positioning as a champion of design even as it reaches hundreds of thousands or millions of users.
This approach also has practical implications for product decisions. When facing the question of whether to build a new feature or expand into a new market category, Figma can ask: "Does this align with our commitment to advancing design thinking and practice?" This criterion naturally filters decisions and maintains strategic coherence even during periods of rapid growth and increasing complexity.
Furthermore, by positioning itself so clearly within the design community rather than positioning itself broadly as a software company, Figma maintains stronger connections with its core audience—designers, design teams, and design-forward organizations. This positioning provides protection against commoditization because it's much harder for competitors to claim that they're advancing design thinking if they don't have deep community engagement and commitment to the design practice.
The Mechanics of Staying Cool While Growing
Several specific mechanisms enable brands to maintain their cool factor and cultural relevance even as they achieve ubiquity in terms of user base and market penetration:
First, differentiation through values alignment: Brands that remain cool don't compete primarily on availability or price; they compete on values and identity. They make it clear what they stand for, and they attract customers who share or aspire to those values. This means that even though a brand might become widely available and used, it maintains a psychological distinction in consumers' minds because it represents something specific and meaningful rather than something generic and mainstream.
Second, community engagement and authenticity: Brands that successfully navigate growth maintain active engagement with their core community and ensure that the brand story remains authentic to its origins and values. This requires ongoing dialogue with core customers, responsiveness to community feedback, and willingness to make decisions that sometimes prioritize community needs over broader market expansion. Harley-Davidson's investment in the Harley Owners Group (HOG) is a textbook example of this—the company continues to invest heavily in community engagement that reinforces the brand's connection to the motorcycle lifestyle.
Third, consistent reinvention within a stable core: Apple and Figma both demonstrate the ability to reinvent and expand their offerings while maintaining consistent core positioning. This isn't contradiction; it's sophistication. The core values, mission, and audience remain stable, but the specific ways those values are expressed evolve as technology, markets, and culture change. This allows the brand to remain relevant across changing contexts without appearing to abandon its original positioning.
Fourth, intentional constraints on growth: The most successful brands in maintaining cool through growth often make deliberate choices to constrain certain types of expansion or to exit market segments that don't align with core positioning. This might mean declining lucrative partnership opportunities, refusing to discount heavily, or maintaining premium positioning even when less expensive alternatives would drive higher market share. These constraints feel like leaving money on the table in the short term, but they preserve brand equity that generates far more value in the long term.
Avoiding the Gap Trap: Lessons From Brand Decline
The contrast between brands that successfully maintain relevance and those that fall into the ubiquity trap provides valuable cautionary lessons. Gap's decline from aspirational brand to generic retailer didn't happen because of bad products or poor customer service. It happened because the brand lost its distinctive positioning and cultural meaning as it pursued aggressive expansion and became omnipresent.
Several factors contributed to Gap's decline into commoditization: First, the brand didn't clearly define or maintain core audience alignment. As the company expanded aggressively, it attempted to appeal to increasingly broad market segments. This broadening of appeal eroded the specificity and distinctiveness that had made Gap appealing in the first place.
Second, Gap's ubiquitous presence eliminated scarcity and exclusivity. When a brand is available on every street corner and in every mall, it becomes convenient and accessible, but it stops being aspirational. The psychological value of wearing or owning something from an exclusive, hard-to-access brand is fundamentally different from wearing something available everywhere.
Third, Gap lost its connection to any particular values or community. The brand didn't stand for anything specific or meaningful beyond offering reasonably priced casual clothing. When a brand is purely functional and doesn't represent any deeper values or identity, it becomes a commodity, and commodities complete primarily on price and convenience.
The lessons from Gap's experience are clear: maintain clarity about core audience and values, preserve some element of distinctiveness and scarcity, ensure that the brand represents something meaningful beyond functional benefits, and resist the pressure to expand endlessly into every possible market segment.
Practical Implications for Growing Companies
For companies experiencing rapid growth and approaching or achieving ubiquity in their markets, several practical implications emerge from this analysis:
First, regularly assess whether growth is eroding brand positioning: As companies scale, they should periodically audit their brand positioning, customer perception, and cultural relevance. Are we still perceived as innovative and forward-thinking, or are we becoming perceived as mainstream and establishment? Do our core customers still identify with our brand values, or are we becoming too diluted and generic? These assessments should drive strategic decisions.
Second, make core audience alignment a strategic anchor: Rather than attempting to maximize addressable market size, define a specific core audience and make decisions that serve that audience exceptionally well. Accept that this will necessarily mean serving other audiences less well, and recognize that this focus is a strength, not a limitation.
Third, maintain clear and consistent value positioning: Ensure that everyone in the organization understands what the brand stands for, what values it represents, and who its core audience is. Use this positioning as a filter for product decisions, partnership opportunities, and market expansion possibilities.
Fourth, invest in community engagement: As the company grows, maintain and deepen engagement with the core community that originally drove adoption and that embodies the brand values. This community becomes increasingly valuable as a source of authentic feedback, early adoption of new offerings, and cultural authenticity.
Fifth, create and maintain differentiation beyond ubiquity: Recognize that once you've achieved wide market penetration, you can't compete on novelty or scarcity alone. Instead, compete on depth of value delivery to your core audience, on community engagement, on values alignment, and on continuous innovation in areas that matter to your core customers.
Conclusion
The principle that "ubiquity is the opposite of cool" represents a fundamental challenge in modern business: the tension between growth and relevance, between expansion and distinctiveness, between serving many and serving specific audiences exceptionally well. Brands like Harley-Davidson, Apple, and Figma have demonstrated that this challenge is manageable, but not through accident or conventional growth strategies. Instead, these brands succeed by maintaining unwavering commitment to core values and audience alignment even as they scale dramatically. For any company pursuing growth, the real challenge isn't achieving market penetration—it's achieving that growth while preserving the brand distinctiveness and cultural relevance that made the growth possible in the first place. The choice, ultimately, is between the short-term gains of undifferentiated expansion and the long-term value of maintaining cool, relevant brand positioning even as you grow.
Original source: "Ubiquity is the opposite of cool"
powered by osmu.app