Learn how Replit's founder built his company by staying visible and authentic. Discover why building in public works, the mental challenges, and when to resp...
Building in Public: A CEO's Guide to Authentic Communication
Key Insights
- Visibility beats silence: Staying publicly visible means critics eventually move on; retreat and you stay a target forever
- The story matters more than overnight success: Replit survived early struggles by sharing a larger vision beyond the company itself
- Authenticity is radical: Being genuinely yourself as a CEO stands out in an industry once dominated by polished PR messaging
- Platform choice determines reach: Twitter influences tech insiders; Instagram and YouTube reach the broader early majority
- Business impact guides your response: Only respond to public criticism when it directly threatens revenue or reputation
Why "Building in Public" Actually Works
Being canceled is ultimately a choice. You can retreat from public view, but if you stay visible and consistent, critics eventually lose interest and move to the next target. The concept of "building in public"—openly sharing communications that would traditionally stay private with employees and investors—brings people along on your journey while giving you practice in authentic communication.
For Replit, this wasn't just about personal branding. The company would likely have failed without a commitment to telling a story larger than the business itself. Early on, Replit wasn't commercially successful, but fundraising and recruiting thrived because we shared a broader vision about making coding accessible. The dream eventually became reality, but at the time, it was only a vision kept alive through constant public articulation.
The Mental Toll and How to Handle It
The psychological impact is real. When facing massive online reactions, your limbic system triggers fight-or-flight mode. You can't sleep, can't eat, and it genuinely damages your wellbeing. Our ancestral brains still think public ostracism means death—and in ancestral villages, it literally could.
Exposure therapy helps. The first public misstep is brutal; the second time, you realize it will blow over. Having strong principles also anchors you. When you act from conviction rather than self-interest alone, it gives you the strength to weather criticism. People remember less than you think—being "canceled" has a shelf life.
When to Respond and When to Stay Silent
Not every criticism deserves a response. The key metric is business impact. Will this actually harm your company's revenue, reputation, or operations? If the answer is no, let the trolls fight in your comments.
A real example: Jason Lemkin from SaaStr used Replit Agent and lost his database when the agent misunderstood his request. The incident gained traction on Twitter. Instead of defending ourselves with "we have backups, it was user error," we owned the mistake. We lacked development/production separation—a real gap. Two days later, we shipped the fix. Starting with "we messed up" generated positive engagement and Jason became a loyal customer, now running his multi-million dollar business with Replit Agent.
The rule: address it only if it has business impact. Do so with principles, not defensiveness. And never try to defend every criticism immediately—that feeds the fire.
Choosing Your Platform Strategy
Twitter dominates tech and insider conversations, but its influence is limited. Instagram, Facebook, and YouTube reach the early majority—the mainstream audience. Starting late on Instagram around February, we saw incredible growth by clipping interview and podcast content. One podcast adapts into multiple formats easily.
The danger with X/Twitter: the algorithm shifts without warning, and transparency has declined. Yet the platform is nearly impossible to abandon—it's where news originates and where journalists find stories. If you're building for early adopters and tech audiences, Twitter is essential. For mass appeal, diversify early.
The harder part isn't posting; it's understanding the meta-narrative. You must frame your argument within the current conversation's Zeitgeist. Satya Nadella's essays work because they address what everyone's discussing (token costs, AI alignment) while advancing Microsoft's perspective. That timing and context takes work to master.
Do You Need to Be the CEO Out Front?
No. There are many paths to success. Some companies thrive with the CEO invisible—Grok's Sunny is the public face while the CEO stays offline. Dario from Anthropic doesn't play social media; his essays speak for themselves. The key is predisposition: does the CEO actually enjoy this? Are they naturally good at it? Forcing a cringe CEO onto social media can hurt the brand more than help.
If the CEO isn't suited for it, invest in coaching early or assign someone else the role. Sharon joining our team elevated our media relations game significantly. The critical part is consistency and authenticity, whether that's the founder or a designated spokesperson.
Conclusion
Building in public works because it humanizes your company and lets you build reputation before you need it. Start with your strengths (Twitter for tech, Instagram for reach), stay authentic, and respond only when business impact is at stake. The mental challenges are real, but exposure therapy—doing the thing you fear—makes it manageable. You don't need to be a natural communicator or social media star; you just need principles, consistency, and the courage to stay visible.
Original source: Amjad Masad on Building Replit in Public
powered by osmu.app